How to name a brand
Naming feels like the creative part and is mostly an elimination process. The good ones survive the screening, they are rarely the ones that win the room.
Generate far more candidates than feels sensible, screen early for trademark class conflicts and domain availability because that removes most of them, then test the survivors for pronunciation, spelling from hearing it, and unfortunate meanings in the languages of your market.
A name does less work than people expect and lasts longer than anything else you will decide. It does not have to explain the business. It has to be sayable, spellable, available and capable of carrying meaning once you have put meaning into it.
Generate wastefully
A hundred candidates is a normal starting point. Real words, invented words, compounds, words from other languages, founders' references, places. The first twenty will be descriptive and most will be unusable.
Screen before you fall in love
Trademark search in the relevant classes, in every market you intend to operate in. Domain availability, including what you would pay for the one you want. Social handles. A plain search for existing companies and, importantly, for anything embarrassing the name already means somewhere.
This stage kills most candidates, which is why generating wastefully matters. Doing it after the team has chosen a favourite is how brands end up with a name plus a vowel removed.
Descriptive names are a trap
They explain the business on day one and constrain it on day one thousand. They are also hard to protect legally and impossible to own in search, because the words belong to the category. A slightly abstract name takes longer to mean something and can eventually mean exactly what you build.
Test the practical things
Say it on a phone call. Spell it to someone who has only heard it. Check how it reads in the languages of your market, where an innocent English word can land badly. Write it small next to the logo. These are not glamorous tests and they are the ones that surface the real problems.
Then stop
No name sounds right at first. Recognition is built, not found, and a committee searching for the name that already feels familiar will choose the most generic candidate every time. Pick the one that survives the screening and can be held, then hold it, which is the argument in audacity and tenacity.
Questions we get asked
Should a brand name describe what the company does?
Usually not. Descriptive names constrain the business later, are hard to protect legally and are impossible to own in search.
When should trademark checks happen in naming?
Early, before anybody chooses a favourite. Trademark and domain screening removes most candidates, which is why you generate far more than you need.
Start with a Growth Audit
Every Colleviate engagement begins with an outside-in read of your brand and its competitive cluster, before we recommend a single line of spend.
Ask for a scoped auditWhat we do · How we produce it · Who we do it for · Talk to us