Founding Design Partner Release · limited onboarding

Board-grade intelligence on any company.

Analyze any company before you invest, compete, or acquire. Every conclusion links back to evidence, across 7,401 fully audited companies. Search one below.

Limited onboarding while we calibrate the models with early customers.

colleviate / live corpus Live
0
Companies audited
0
Executive briefs generated
0
Board-ready dossiers
0
Companies indexed
0
Data sources
Live
Continuous monitoring
This is what a subscriber's weekly brief looks like Illustrative
SnowflakeExecutive departure detected3h ago
DatadogAI-answer visibility increasedYesterday
HubSpotHiring momentum slowingConfidence 91%
Corpus lookup

Look up a real company. Read real output.

A live search across a public sample from the corpus: real companies, real forensic scores, one real finding from the most recent audit. This is engine output, not a mockup. Full board-grade dossiers are $599 each, delivered in 5 business days.

colleviate / corpus / public-sample Real data
Forensic risk /100 Audited Source coverage

Redacted in the public sample: full findings, peer graph, board questions, evidence citations
Request the full dossier · $599 Read a real one
That company is not in the public sample. The full corpus holds 7,401 continuously monitored companies including every US SEC filer. Any company can be requested as a dossier for $599 — request one now or email to confirm coverage first.

Scores and findings are computed by the engine from public disclosure and digital signal, with provenance. Sample is read-only and refreshed from the corpus.

The corpus

The corpus is the asset.

12,179 companies indexed. 7,401 fully audited. Every company observed adds resolved entities, weighted relationships, and validated findings to one cross-company knowledge graph, so each new audit is grounded in everything the corpus already knows. This is accumulated organizational memory, and it is not reproducible in a quarter.

colleviate / graph · illustrative 12,179 companies and counting
competes supplies customers channel node = entity · edge weight = confidence · RFI = peer friction Illustrative
Real entities

Competitors, foundries, memory, hyperscaler customers, model labs, server OEMs, and GPU clouds, resolved as one graph.

Weighted dependency

Every link is derived from evidence, not assumed, and carries a relationship type, a weight, and a confidence.

Cross-company grounding

A finding on one company is scored against its cluster. Each peer carries its own Revenue Friction Index.

Live engine

Analyze a public company.

Type a company and watch it move through the engine: signals arrive, the graph updates, inference runs, the Revenue Friction Index resolves, and an executive finding appears. Illustrative simulation

colleviate / engine / live finding generated
Ingest stream
10-Q filing ingested
HIRE 6 sales roles detected
PRICE pricing page changed
RVW review batch parsed
XSCR transcript embedded
Pipeline
Ingest signals
Update graph
Run inference
Validate evidence
Generate finding
Revenue Friction
NVIDIA
72/100
confidence 0.91
Executive finding

Channel concentration elevates revenue risk despite record demand.

Revenue Friction Index

Where future growth is constrained.

One score for where future growth is constrained, decomposed into confidence-scored dimensions and benchmarked against real peers. Here is what it looks like on a real company.

colleviate / corpus / NVIDIA / revenue-friction Illustrative output
Corpus
NVIDIA72
Broadcom58
AMD64
Qualcomm61
Robinhood69
Snowflake55
NVIDIASemiconductors
72/100
Revenue Friction Index confidence 0.91 42 evidence citations
Primary dependency · channel concentration
Channel dependenceconf 0.91 · 83
Customer concentrationconf 0.88 · 76
Competitive exposureconf 0.84 · 61
Demand durabilityconf 0.79 · 48
Structural peer cluster
Broadcom0.86
AMD0.81
Qualcomm0.77
Inference trace
Retrieved 42 grounded citations
Detected channel concentration
Cross-referenced peer cluster
Computed confidence 0.91
Generated board finding

Illustrative output. Representative of the platform's analysis structure. Company shown is a public entity analyzed from public data; no affiliation or endorsement implied. Live customer outputs replace this for design partners.

Why it holds up

Every conclusion links back to evidence.

A static report decays the day it ships. Colleviate runs continuously, so the intelligence stays current and every number stays traceable to its source.

01

Grounded intelligence

Inference runs retrieval-grounded against the cross-company knowledge graph. Findings are scored against real peers and carry confidence, so the output is decision-grade signal, not model opinion.

02

Continuous governance

Observation loops re-score the Revenue Friction Index as new signals land, collapsing signal-to-decision latency from quarters to hours. Governance becomes a standing control plane, not an annual review.

03

End-to-end provenance

Every metric carries provenance: source citation, confidence score, and decision traceability from raw signal to board sentence. 100 percent of corpus metrics are grounded.

Platform architecture

An actual system, with feedback loops.

Signals flow from the open internet through parallel collection, into a graph and evidence layer, through grounded multi-agent inference, and back into memory. Private connectors embed the same loop into internal systems, RevOps, CRM, and ERP, for real-time diagnostics and sustained governance; connected first-party data is isolated per customer and never feeds the shared corpus. The dashed paths are feedback and planned work.

LAYER 01Ingestion
InternetContinuous crawlersQueuesSignal collection
LAYER 02Processing
Document parsingEntity extractionSignal normalizationDeduplicationFeature engineeringSearch index
LAYER 03Knowledge
EmbeddingsVector storeEntity resolutionKnowledge graphEvidence layerRetrieval
LAYER 04Inference
Multi-agent orchestrationMOSAMBI modelsConfidence propagationRevenue Friction Index
LAYER 05Intelligence
Executive findingsBoard reportsDecision traceabilityEnterprise API · Q3 2026
LAYER 06Memory and loops
Continuous monitoringfeedback → knowledgefeedback → inferenceEnterprise memoryPrivate connectors · in devAutonomous actions · planned

parallel collection · retrieval-grounded inference · confidence propagation · graph evolution · feedback into memory · dashed = planned

One complete pass
01
Evidence
02
Embeddings
03
Graph
04
Retrieval
05
Reasoning
06
Validation
07
Executive report
Current platform

Measurable, today.

0
Companies indexed
0
Full audits in the corpus
0
Executive briefs generated
0
Board-ready dossiers
0
Claim-verification records
0
Claims independently verified
0
Data sources
14-day
Re-collection cadence

Counts measured from the live corpus on 12 Jul 2026. Verification rate measured across 2,315 claim-verification records; method on the methodology page.

MOSAMBI

A decision model. Not a methodology.

Definition

MOSAMBI is Colleviate’s internal decision model for weighting evidence and resolving enterprise growth signals across multiple dimensions.

It is a technical component of the platform, not a consulting methodology. It defines how the engine weights evidence, scores each dimension, and resolves a company into one growth signal, calibrated against the corpus.

MMarket position
OOperational health
SStrategic posture
AAudience intelligence
MMeasurement integrity
BBusiness and financial health
IIntelligence loop
Hard questions

What a technical investor asks first.

How much is operational today versus mocked?

The crawler, evidence grounding, knowledge graph, reasoning engine, Revenue Friction Index, and board reports run today. Autonomous execution is not built; it is on the roadmap and labeled as such. Sample outputs on this page are marked illustrative.

How is the Revenue Friction Index validated?

Findings are scored by evidence depth and checked against the cross-company corpus. Validation against realized outcomes is the active work with design partners, comparing predicted friction to subsequent results.

Why is MOSAMBI durable, not a branded framework?

It is an algorithm: a defined way to weight evidence, score each dimension, and resolve a company into a signal, calibrated against the corpus. Its value compounds with the data it runs on, so it strengthens as the corpus grows.

Why can a large incumbent not reproduce this in a year?

The defensibility is not the model. It is the continuously accumulated cross-company graph and the calibration that comes from observing thousands of companies over time. That data and its labels are not purchasable in a quarter.

How does the graph become proprietary?

Every company observed adds resolved entities, relationships, and validated findings. The graph and its confidence calibration are unique to Colleviate and sharpen with each pass.

How fresh is the data?

Audits re-collect on a 14-day cycle, and longitudinal history accrues per company on every pass, so the Nth audit reads a trajectory, not a snapshot. Counts on this page are measured from the live corpus, dated, and updated with each release.

What is the wedge into the enterprise?

Outside-in intelligence needs no integration to start. A design partner sees value before connecting a single internal system, then embeds the platform into RevOps, CRM, and ERP through private connectors, turning one audit into real-time growth diagnostics and sustained governance. First-party data stays isolated to that customer; the shared corpus is public-signal only.

Why we built Colleviate
Enterprise software has systems for finance, security, engineering, and operations. It has no system for reasoning about growth. That is the gap Colleviate exists to fill.

The work is systems, not campaigns: continuous observation, a cross-company knowledge graph, and grounded analysis that produces explainable, board-ready intelligence. The team builds it after years inside enterprise growth, where the recurring failure was structural rather than tactical. Every function had instrumentation. Nothing reasoned across them.

Read the full story ›

Sid
Founder, Colleviate
FAQ

Common questions.

What is Colleviate?

Colleviate is an AI-native enterprise growth intelligence platform. It reads any company outside-in from public signals, builds a cross-company knowledge graph, runs grounded evidence-cited inference, and produces a Revenue Friction Index that shows where growth is constrained. It is software, not an agency.

Is Colleviate an agency or a consultancy?

No. Marketing, consulting, SEO, and RevOps are implementation layers. Colleviate is a software product that observes, reasons, and produces a board-grade dossier. It does not run campaigns or replace your team.

What is the Revenue Friction Index?

The Revenue Friction Index is a continuously updated enterprise health signal, comparable to a credit score. It quantifies where a company is losing growth, decomposes into confidence-scored dimensions, and updates as new evidence arrives.

How does Colleviate read a company without internal access?

It reads companies outside-in from public signals: website and performance, search visibility, reviews, hiring, pricing, filings, and competitive movement. No onboarding or internal data access is required to start, which is what lets it analyze any company.

Does Colleviate integrate with internal systems?

Yes, by design. Outside-in analysis requires no access and is how every engagement starts. From there the platform embeds into internal systems such as RevOps, CRM, and ERP through private data connectors, so diagnostics run against live internal data and governance is sustained rather than episodic. The data boundary is strict: your first-party data stays yours, is used only for your own diagnostics, and never enters the shared corpus or the cross-company graph, which are built entirely from public signals. Connectors are in development with design partners.

How do I buy a dossier?

Any company, any tier, on the pricing page. Executive Dossier is $599 one-off, delivered board-ready in 5 business days. Intelligence Subscription is $399 per month. Read a real sample first at colleviate.com/sample-dossier.

Ready when you are

Three ways to start.

Look up any of 7,401 monitored companies for free. Request a full board-grade Executive Dossier on one company for $599, delivered in 5 business days. Or subscribe at $399 per month to monitor five companies continuously, with one dossier included each quarter, so the board never has to ask “what changed” again.

What every dossier contains
01  The one board-level question that ranks above the rest 02  Strategic chain from signal to economic stake 03  Peer-cluster grounding & forensic finding 04  Five leadership questions ready for the next agenda 05  Evidence citations & how the thesis could be wrong
CEOs & BoardsPE / VCCorp-devCMO / CGOPortfolio ops